Authors:
1. “EcoMashGeo” Ltd.
Koteniov Vasilyi
Iliich
Kitaev Alexander
Andreevich
Barsukova Elena Yurievna
2. Moscow State Institute of Steel and Alloys (The
Technological University)
Kurunov Ivan Philipovich
3. “Tulachermet” Plc.
Vlassov Vladimir
Ivanovich
Murat Sergei Gavrilovich
4. Republican Unitary Plant “Byelorussian
Metallurgical Plant”
Matochkin Victor Arkadievich
Anders Vladimir Vladimirovich
Steblov Anver Borisovich
5. “Hanino Ironworks” Close Corporation
Laptev Oleg Victorovich
6. Federal National Unitary Enterprise «National Scientific Centre of “Timber Industry
Complex»
Saraikin Valeri Georgievich
Contents
Introduction……………………………………………………………………..4
The state policy in the sphere of environmental protection.
The situation
in the sphere of waste utilization and recycling
abroad and in
Russia.
The urgency of utilization and recycling of industrial waste.
The technology of metallurgical briquettes production………………..11
The method of production of iron-carbon-containing briquettes.
The comparative
analysis of the charge preparation according to
the
traditional method and our technology.
The technological scheme of production of metallurgical briquettes.
The metallurgical value of iron-carbon-containing
briquettes……….15
The types of briquettes.
The mineral-graphic efforts of the processes within briquettes.
Charcoal in metallurgy……………….……………………………….………18
The calculation of the economic effectiveness of
briquettes usage…19
The calculation
of the economic effectiveness of briquettes
usage in
blast-furnace production.
The calculation
of the economic effectiveness of briquettes
usage in steel-making
production.
The tests of introduction of briquettes into
metallurgical refinings….22
The test of introduction of briquettes into blast-furnace production.
The test of introduction of briquettes into electric furnace
steelmaking.
The test of introduction of briquettes into open-hearth production.
The test of introduction of briquettes into foundry.
References…….…………………………………………………………..…..36
8. The presentation of the technology of
utilization and recycling
of industrial waste…………………….………………………………………….38
9. Conclusion……..……………………………………………………………….39
10. The list of the literature………………………………………………………41

The current situation
in Russia in the sphere
of formation, storage, usage (recycling) and utilization
of industrial waste leads to dangerous pollution of the environment,
unpractical usage of natural
resources and consequently to considerable economic damage.
Around 80
billion tons of hard waste of metallurgical, machine
building, mineral resource and chemical industries and of fuel and energy
complexes have been accumulated in the dumps and deposits of our
country. Every year around 7 million tons of such waste are
formed in Russia. Those are in
fact handmade man-caused deposits, material resources that had been removed
from the economic circulation. Many types of these mineral resources do not
exist nowadays.
By volume,
content and composition of useful components being in industrial waste, the
stocks of man-caused deposits are comparable to the natural deposits in use.
There is also a
reasonable suspicion that the real reserves of the man-caused deposits are much
higher than it is officially stated.
For example, the
geologists of the USSR used to be paid award for a discovered deposit, whose
amount depended on its volume; that is why there was a stimulus to raise the
volume too high (for example, Urengoi, where the original valuation of oil and
gas reserves turned out to have been raised too high (almost two times more) in
comparison to the reality).
The
representatives of metallurgy, chemical, machine-building and other industries
understate the volume of emission in order to decrease the ecological payment
that a plant pays for every ton of waste. So, one can only guess the amount of
reserves of industrial waste on the territory of the countries of the
Commonwealth of Independent States and in Russia in general.
The waste that
contains toxic as well as carcinogenic substances causes alarm as the total
amount of it has reached 1,6 billion tons.
For example, for today in Tula region more
than 17 million tons of waste of metallurgical and
chemical plants that contain compounds of various metals (iron in the first
place) have been accumulated.
Such vast
deposits occupy huge areas close to men’s habitation. Around 10 000 hectares of
off-the-shelf land are being used for grounds and dumps of solid industrial
waste annually in Russia. One can only
guess the areas that are occupied by unsanctioned dumps. The existing situation
is a real threat to the health of the current and future generations of the
country.
Today
“EcoMashGeo” Ltd. has a unique technology of identification of the verges and volumes of man-caused waste deposits of
different regions, located at a
depth of up to 150 meters with the resolving ability up to 0.2 meters. This
technology differs from the traditional geo-radar technologies as it has a better
self-descriptiveness, resolving ability and depth of exploration.
The exhaustion
of natural resources and the global character of pollution of the environment
have aggravated the necessity of rational combination of flexibility of the
market economy capable of a quick material reorientation and a far-sighted
national policy of nature management stimulating waste usage and reducing the
negative impact on the environment.
“The Ecological
Doctrine of the Russian Federation” (confirmed by the decree of the Government
of the Russian Federation on 31st of August, 2002, ¹1225-p) defines
the tendency of the development of systems of recycled resources usage
including waste recycling as well as introduction of resource-saving and
wasteless technologies in all spheres of economical activity as a priority
tendency of the national policy in the ecology sphere.
One of the ways
of succeeding the strategic aim of the national policy in the ecology sphere is
maximal profound usage of the extracted minerals and mined biological resources
as well as minimization of waste and damage to natural environment. The working
out of the effective national policy in the sphere of waste management hasn’t
been finished yet.
The formation
of modern norm and technological data for generation and realization of the
effective public policy in the sphere of waste recycling requires the solution
of this problem at the federal level, as this problem is significant for the
functioning of the economy on the whole, of its single branches and regions,
for the social development and living conditions of the population.
A close
analysis of the situation on the one hand and scientific and technical reserves
on the other hand show that against a background of steady reduction of natural
resources reserves, their net cost advance, a constant advance of energy
supply and rail transport rates, the necessity of competent raw material
reorientation of metallurgical, machine building, mineral resource and chemical
industries and fuel and energy complexes has arisen.
The location of
waste near to the plants does not require huge expenditures on exploring and
opening up, routine and patented practice ensure its usage as relatively cheap
raw material for different plants, that noticeably (30-50%) lowers net cost of
finished products. Recycling of waste will help to solve the ecological problem
of purification of industrial regions.

The complex
management of utilization and recycling of industrial waste is a world
recognized principle of natural resources management today. Several countries,
mainly in Western Europe and Northern
America, began to use this principle of industrial waste utilization and recycling
in the mid seventies.
After the USSR decay, Russia is still one
of the biggest suppliers of raw materials, i.e. of industrial waste.
The current
situation in the Russian
Federation in the sphere of formation,
storage, usage (recycling) and utilization of industrial waste leads to
dangerous pollution of the environment, and to noticeable economic damage.
Most of waste,
generated both in industrial and communal cities, is literally a resource. That
is why it is necessary to switch to a new paradigm regarding hard industrial
waste: it is possible not to annihilate this waste and store it in
“mortuaries”, but to economically use it. In Russia, unlike in the
Occident where active national policy in the sphere of secondary usage of industrial
waste is being pursued, the part of secondary resources in the raw material
balance is insignificant.
Difference
between the level of industrial waste usage can be
traced by the example of the usage of ashes of thermal power stations.
Ash-and-slag waste
of ashes of thermal power stations in Germany are used by 80%, in France by
65%, in the UK by 53%, in Moscow area (the most advanced innovative
technologies) only by 1,03%. So, ash and slag are not being used in fact near
Moscow, i.e. they are not applied and their piling in the region is more than
20 million tons.
The situation
is the same in the sphere of fine-fractional fine iron-containing waste
recycling.
In 1998 in
Russia the act “About waste of industries and consumption”, aimed at prevention
of detrimental effect of industrial waste on population health and environment,
reducing the population catastrophe in the regions and reducing waste
production and involving them in economic circulation as raw material was
promulgated. The federal program “Waste” was created with the purpose of
gaining the annual recycling and usage of 55 billion tons of waste and of
saving 20-25% of material and technical resources and of reduction of areas for
waste with the perspective of creation of capacious market of resource saving,
ecologically free and low-waste technologies, as well as waste
recycling technologies. The perspectives of program realization are
obscure owing to liquidation of program customer, the State Ecology Committee
of Russia in 2000 and owing to a standard Russian problem of underfinancing.
A close analysis of “The Ecological Doctrine of the Russian Federation” (confirmed by the decree of the Government of the Russian Federation on 31st of August, 2002, ¹1225-p) shows that this document
does not ensure a complex approach to the questions of environmental protection
and management of waste recycling. Based on this document norm and
legal data is rather complex and ineffective, deserves no credit. All that
leads to difficulties in its application.
The lack of
mechanisms of development and management policy of waste utilization and
recycling processes in regions and federal regions gave cause to the
development of the offered technology.
“EcoMashGeo” Ltd. sees the solving of the existing problems in the model
of industrial waste recycling management as a whole environmental ecological
system. The main ecological problem of Russia is the lack of definite and distinct organizational model of management,
that would reflect regional approach, consider administrative division of Russia, the possibility to use man-caused waste of near by regions, and that
would open possibilities for effective interaction of different management
levels in the subjects of Russia.
For today local
authorities do not take part in the process of making decisions in the
questions of industrial waste utilization and recycling management at the level
of municipal units and the subjects of Russia.
The principle
“who pollutes more, pays more” does not
work: the existing payments for pollution of the environment are sources of
enriching budgets of different levels and only partially used to finance
actions on industrial waste utilization and recycling and environmental
protection.
On the basis of the said above it is possible to draw a conclusion: today
there is not a single body at the federal level, in the subjects of Russia or municipal units, that would be responsible
for utilization and recycling of industrial waste and men waste.
That can become a serious obstacle for effective and complex solving of
the problems posed in the Ecological Doctrine of the Russian Federation.
The traditional solution of ecological problems is unprofitable, and does
not make a profit for a plant. The technology of industrial waste utilization
and recycling that we offer ensures not only the solution of the existing
ecological problems, but is high-performance and profitable.

The urgency of the
given theme arose at the turn of two contradictions originated in metallurgy
industry. They are introduced on scheme
¹ 1:
On the one
hand:
the reserves of coking coal are
being steadily reduced, its
price grows permanently;
the mining of natural iron-ore raw material is diminishing;
new deposits are not opened up in fact;
a constant growth of the rates on energy supply and rail transportation.
On the other
hand:
the accumulated
over the decades waste of metallurgical, machine-building, mining and chemical
manufactures, fuel and energy complexes continues to grow;
the location of waste near to metallurgical works;
huge expenditures on their opening up are not required.
The analysis of
the mentioned contradictions has allowed us to formulate a scientific problem
with the solution in two directions:
On the one
hand:
- waste
processing and utilizing and using it as a relatively cheap raw material for
metallurgical manufacture noticeably lowers expenditures on mix material
and improves the quality and competitive strength, and
above all lowers the net cost
of the finished product.
On the other
hand:
- the solution of the ecological problem of purification of
whole regions where many man-caused waste deposits have been accumulated, and also reclaiming of current storage of waste of the mentioned
above manufactures.
The existing
technologies of secondary usage of waste of different industries (above all of
metallurgical industry) are imperfect. For example, the usage of
agglo-blast-furnace sludge by production of agglomerates has the technological
refining of not more than 250 kg/ton of agglomerate.
The dust of dry
coke-quenching installations – the most valuable fuel with a high content of
carbon – is only used as a material for steel scoria frothing in electric arc
ovens or is added to mix material for coking.
The experts of “EcoMashGeo” Ltd. who have been working on the development since 1997, have
accumulated a major technological potential at the turn of metallurgy and
building technologies and developed an
essentially new method of preparation of mix material for metallurgical
refining.
As a result of
a long-term work the metallurgical briquette with the usage of a
non-traditional binder and a carbonic filler for all types
of metallurgical refining has been generated, i.e. an essentially new composite
mix material, whose application in metallurgy can return industrial waste to
metallurgical refining as iron-carbon-containing briquettes with a high profitability.
The manufacture
of such briquettes will allow to essentially improve
performance characteristics of the refining at your plants and thus improve the
ecological situation.
The complex
scheme of the waste utilization is shown on scheme ¹ 2, from which we see, that to the machine industry waste
that can be returned as raw material with a maximum productivity it is possible
to refer:
roll scale and forge cinder;
iron and steel
cuttings;
- metal sifting;
- aspiration settings
dust.
To the
metallurgy industry waste it is possible to refer:
- blast-furnace dust;
- aspiration settings dust;
- scorias and slurries;
- roll scale;
- coke breeze and dust.
To the coal
mining industry waste can be referred:
- coal fines and dust;
- slurry;
- mill tailings.
To the
by-product-coking industry waste it is possible to refer:
- coke breeze and dust;
- resin.
To the fuel and
energy complex waste it is possible to refer:
- ashes;
- coal dust.
To the wood
industry waste it is possible to refer:
- charcoal fine;
- lignosulphonates;
- wood waste;
- etc.
All these can be utilized by the method of cold
sintering.


Sintering is
one of the actual problems in preparation of iron-containing materials for
metallurgical refining.
For today there
are three known methods of sintering of small-sized ores, concentrates and
waste. They are agglomeration, granulation (pelletizing) and briquetting.
Agglomeration is a process of generation of
pieces (agglomerates) by the method of sintering of small-sized ores and a
concentrate with the fuel material at a high combustion temperature.
Pelletizing
is a process of generation of pellets, based on the character of the humidified atomized ore particles or a
concentrate to organize a pellet of a greater or smaller size and durability,
that is put into the necessary size and shape by rolling in special devices,
the following sintering gives extra durability.
Briquetting is a process of generation of pieces
(briquettes) with adding and without adding binder materials with the following
pressing the mixture into briquettes of the necessary size and shape.
The return of
the mentioned above waste to the economy of the country is possible in the form
of raw material almost without overhead expenses by the ecologically free
method of cold sintering.
In Russia at present
about 52 million tons of agglomerate and 30 million tons of pellets are
fabricated. At the same time only in April 2003 the production of briquettes in
industrial volumes was begun for the first time in Russia at
“Tulachermet” Plc.
Though
briquetting in ferrous metallurgy is one of the earliest methods of sintering,
which was widely used for this purpose in the second half of the 19th
century, at the beginning of the 20th century briquetting was ousted
by agglomeration. There were several reasons for that, the
main of them was the diseconomy as the low-power presses had a low
productivity, while in agglomeration the machines with the productivity of more
than 2000 tons of agglomerate per day were generated.
For today the
technological progress has reached such a level, when it is possible to briquette
more than 5000 tons of raw material per day at an
automatic line and this method is pollution-free and wasteless.
Unfortunately,
there is not a single Russian producer of automatic lines with high
productivity. Generally, all the lines for the building industry (production of
blocks, curbs, paving slabs and so on) are imported. According to the data,
given by the Customs Committee of the Russian
Federation during two last years 960 lines of
such kind with componentry and spares at the cost of 2,5
billion US dollars have been imported (only for building purposes, not
registering the needs of metallurgists). The urgency of organization of
production of high capacity vibrocompression equipment for industrial waste
utilization and recycling is obvious.
To the
doubtless advantages of briquette as compared to agglomerate and pellet it is
possible to refer the following ones:
briquettes are regularly shaped and have identical weight,
contain more metal in the given volume, have a higher durability and a better
transportability;
have a higher relative density;
the ecological safety of briquettes (wastelessness, absence of high
temperature during the production process);
the possibility of using (in any ratio) in briquette some carbonic filler
for activation of the processes in the metallurgical oven (carbonizer,
regenerator, energy carrier);
the possibility of using all types of fine
iron-flux-alloy-carbon-containing waste of
metallurgical refining.
The ultimate
strength, density and porosity of briquette are taken as the parameters. They
are reached in the prescribed limits by influencing on mix material by unit
pressure 0,025-0,09 ÌPa, vibration with frequency of 35-65 Hz and vibrational amplitude 0,25-0,55 mm up to a condition, that ensures
reaching the required setting values of these parameters, thus the
humidification is done before obtaining
the water-binding ratio, fixed for the given mix.
During the
development of the briquette production technology we had the following
priority objectives:
to obtain the briquette with the specified characteristics on demand of a
definite customer (this technology gives the opportunity to obtain the
briquette with the specified geometrical proportions and physical properties)
the composition of the briquette which defines its metallurgical value is
developed by the specialists – the metallurgists of the plant – briquette
consumers.
the
effectiveness of briquette production and usage, that is reached by locating of
the briquette plant near to the waste deposits and melting units, that are
usually situated next to each other.
high productivity, low net cost of the vibropress equipment, minimal
operating staff (the vibropress “Rukis” with the
productivity up to 5000 tons of briquette a month is served by 5 persons per
shift).
One more
direction of the research is the analysis of the influence of the shape and
geometrics of briquette on the metallurgical properties of the mix material.

Let us see the
traditional scheme of preparation of the mix material for steel melting and
according to our technology, which are shown on scheme ¹3.
We do not
consider the processes of mix material production for steel refining, that are
connected with the direct reduction of iron and melts in the fluid pot, such as
Midrex, Korex, Hill, Finmet, Rawmelt, Hissmelt, etc, though for these processes it is possible to
use briquetted mix material.
The traditional
method of transportation of iron and fuel to the filling and rolling stations
is rather long, energy intensive and costs much. This method consists of the
following stages:
geological exploration and opening up of the deposits;
mining and enrichment of the iron-ore raw material and coal;
production of iron-ore pellets, agglomerate and coal coke;
blast-furnace refining with its product – hot metal and pig-iron as
well as “Synthicom”;
steel production by the known processes (open-hearth, converter, electric
furnace).
At every stage
waste is generated. Its metallurgical value is very high and it has not been
completely realized. Among it: roll and forge scale, aspiration setting dust,
ashes, blast-furnace dust, sludge, pig-iron and steel cuttings, coke breeze and
others. The offered by us technology gives you the opportunity to avoid three
capacious and expensive technological processes (see scheme ¹3).
The specialists
will ask about the excessive content of the detrimental impurities in the used
waste (sulphur, phosphorus, alkali, non-ferrous metals and others). I would
like to say that when smelting pure special steel it is possible to use
high-purity materials:
highly enriched iron concentrates;
charcoal;
pyrolytic carbon, graphite;
etc.
Surely,
briquette can be one of the components of the mix material,
that will supplement the traditional steel waste, hot metal or pig-iron.
Though during the smetlings at the
“Tiazhpromarmatura” Plc. (Aleksin, Tula Region) pig-iron was completely
replaced by iron-carbon briquette.
The usage of
briquette gives steelmakers (arc furnaces) the opportunity to use two
components of the mix material: steel waste and iron-carbon briquette.
The actual
objective of the steelmakers is the problem of carbon: there is too much of it
(converter), or too little (open-hearth and electric furnace ovens). In
briquette it is possible to have 50% of carbon by mass. In the same way the briquette (ÁÆÓ-ÄÏ, ÁÆÓ-ÄÃ) is
fabricated, whose basic part consists of FeO.

So, how could
we provide the unique characteristics of briquette?
As it has
already been said, this problem was solved at the turn of two technologies:
metallurgy and production of building materials.
The specialists
of “Ecomashgeo” Ltd have developed the ways of updating the typical
vibropression equipment with the aim of its adjustment to the metallurgical
briquette production.
The
technological scheme of metallurgical briquette production is shown on scheme ¹ 4, where we can see the basic
technological blocks:
intake and storing of loose materials;
feeding of the mix material;
preparation of the mix material in the blending machine;
molding;
transportation to the station of the strength development;
packaging (as needed) and transportation of briquettes to the
metallurgical manufacture.
The plans of
the technological lines of metallurgical briquette production with different productivity is shown
on scheme ¹ 5.
The area of application
of briquettes is shown on scheme ¹ 2:
blast-furnace production;
steelmaking industry, which is divided into converter industry,
open-hearth industry, and electric furnace steelmaking;
ferroalloy industry;
foundry manufacture, which is divided into cupola-furnace and
electric arc oven.
The offered
technology allows to avoid three most capacious and expensive processes in
metallurgy and to ensure purification of regions. The most important principle
of our technology is that all this raw material is located next to
metallurgical plants and is not called for (if we compare the distance between
a plant and weakly rich deposits of natural resources, the conclusion is
obvious). For example, “MECHEL” Plc. uses concentrates of the ore mining and
processing enterprise in Korshunovo with the content of iron not less than 40
%, in the presence of reserves of its own sludge with the content of iron 50 %.


With the
metallurgists of some plants from Russia and abroad, we
have defined the area of briquette application and developed its composition.
In 2001 a lot
of technical specifications, such as ÒÓ-
0320-002-55978394-2001, ÒÓ-
0780-001-55978394-2001 were published.
The types of briquette and their
metallurgical value are shown on scheme
¹ 6.
Blast-furnace
production:
ÁÆÓ-Ä - briquette,
as a substitute of iron-containing raw material (agglomerate, pellets, metal
admixture), blast-furnace coke and flux;
ÁÆÓ-ÄÏ - briquette
for washing of the well of blast
furnaces (FåÎ 40-60 %);
ÁÆÓ-ÄÑ - briquette
with manganese and silicium for smelting of special
iron grades;
ÁÆÓ-ÄÃ - briquette
for growing of the wall accretion of the
well of blast furnaces.
Steelmaking manufacture:
ÁÆÓ-C – briquette as a
substitute of iron, carbonic scrap, carbonic
additives and flux;
ÁÆÓ-ÑË - briquette
with deoxidizing alloy additions (Mn, Si, Àl etc.);
ÁÆÓ-ÑÊ - briquette
for scorification and temperature control in the steel furnace;
ÁÆÓ-ÑÄ – a composite
briquette with alloy additions and wood charcoal as a regenerator.
Ferroalloy manufacture:
ÁÆÓ-Ô – a composite
briquette for production of ferroalloys (with FåSi, FåÑã, FåS, Ñã, SiÌn, FåÌn, S, Àl and carbon in the form of coke breeze and dag, powdered wood
charcoal).
Foundry manufacture at the machine works:
ÁÆÓ-ËÑ – a special
briquette with alloy additions and deoxidizing additives;
ÁÆÓ-Ë× – a composite
iron-containing briquette as a substitute of pig iron and waste iron when
obtaining hot metal for casts;
ÁÆÓ-ËÄ – a composite
briquette with wood charcoal as a
regenerator.
Thereby Tula has confirmed
once again that it is called the native land of the Russian iron and steel
industry.
In 2003 the first blast-furnace plant, which
was constructed on the river Tuliza by Vinius and Makena, will celebrate
the 370th anniversary.
The research of
the metallurgical characteristics of briquette was done in laboratories on the
samples that had been smelted in the resistance furnace.

The conducted
mineral-graphic efforts are shown on scheme
¹ 7, where you can see the reductive
processes in the iron-carbon briquette in the oven in the nitrogen current. The
results are obtained at the sections with the help of the optical microscope.
Picture ¹1. The initial composition of briquette
68 % - oxide
scale;
20 % - coking
dust;
12 % - the
binder;
Få (total) - 48 %, C - 16 %
compression strength -130 kg / ñì3; t – 20
ºC
accessible porosity - 16 %;
density - 2,1 kg / ñì3
The light
fission-fragment flakes of oxide scale with dark round slices of coke breeze
and grey straps and impregnations of the binder (cement stone) between them.
Picture ¹2. The shear of the briquette that was heated up to t –
850…900°C is shown (the beginning of the softening).
The formation
of metal iron in the form of impregnations of a light colour
in wustite grains inside the bits of the oxide scale,
the shape of the bits of the oxide scale is saved.
Picture ¹3. The shear of the briquette that was heated up to t -
900…1100°Ñ is shown.
The junction of the impregnations of metal iron into a porous jaw of a light
grey colour.
Picture ¹ 4. The shear of the briquette that was heated up to t -
1100…1200°Ñ is shown.
The integration
of the segments of the reduced iron and its saturation with carbon in the form
of the hypereutectoid steel with a light cement net at
the edges of grains.
Picture ¹5. The shear of the briquette that was heated up to t -
1400°C is shown (the end of the softening).
The carbonization of the metal bits up to a condition of pig-iron.
Picture ¹6. The final composition of the briquette is shown:
the microsection from fractionally disrupted cake
of a light brown colour with shiny formations of different shapes of the recovered metal iron.
Firing
temperature – 1400 °Ñ;
the degree of metallization - 95 %;
Få (total) - 61 %, Få (met) - 58 %, ÑàÎ/Si2 = 1,7.
From the
above-stated we have come to the following conclusions:
1. The carbon
of the carbon-containing component of the briquette completely reduces the oxides
of iron up to metal iron with its consequent carbonization.
2. The finished
product of the sintering of the iron-carbon briquette at the temperature of the
end of the softening is pig-iron.
3. The
accessible porosity, density and compression strength of the carbonic briquette
are the regulators of mix design for the metallurgical refining.
In the same way
we have proven that every iron-carbon briquette when the heat energy is placed
form outside can be called a mini blast-furnace.
We have developed and counted economically
sound prices of metallurgical briquettes; though for each manufacture depending
on the production conditions, outputs and volumes of usage in the refining
these prices will vary.
For example, for the blast furnace with the
volume from 1000 m3 up to 2000 m3 the calculations have
been made according to the traditional method (Table 5.1.1.) and with the usage
of iron-carbon briquettes for the manufacture of foundry pig-iron and without
them (Table 5.1.2.).

The best
carbon-containing material for metallurgical refining is coke breeze. But it is
a well-known fact that the reserves of coking coal are reducing, expenditures
on production are growing, and coke breeze will be as scarce as coke.
It is specialists’
of “EcoMashGeo” Ltd. opinion that coke breeze in metallurgical briquette can be
replaced by charcoal. Of course, we do not call to come back to the times of
Demidov when burning of charcoal was done primitively what greatly damaged the
environment. We only offer the technology of charcoal production similar to the
technology that was created by “Mannesmann” for Brazil. This
technology presupposes growing of high growth species of eucalyptuses during
six years with the purpose of getting charcoal and resin.
This technology
has one weakness: the necessity to get charcoal with high mechanical strength
and of a large size.
The technology
of charcoal production of “EcoMashGeo” Ltd. and Federal National Unitary Enterprise
«National Scientific Centre of “Timber Industry Complex» ensures the usage of
all parts of trees of different species (including low-grade trees – poplar,
alder).
Of course, Russia is not Brazil, but it is
possible to grow trees within 15 years for coal burning. Besides, for the last
decades because of lack of sanitary felling the woods of the central region of Russia have abundant
number of stale wood. That leads to negative oxygen balance due to abundant
isolation of ÑÎ2 by rotting
trees. This problem is urgent for the Moscow region.
This resource
can be used for production of charcoal.
In such
countries as Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, etc. (with
humid tropical and subtropical climate) where it is possible to place planting
of high-growth trees, there are reserves of iron ore. Metallurgical plants can
be interested in this technology.
Climate
conditions of the mentioned above regions ensure reduction of production costs
on heat treatment of briquettes (solar technology).


Table 5.1.1.
Net cost of
briquette
|
Briquette composition
|
Contents, %
|
Price per ton, rubles
|
Cost, rubles
|
|
Roll scale
|
30
|
300
|
90,0
|
|
Sludge of sintering plants
|
15
|
25
|
3,7
|
|
Fine metal additive
|
25
|
915
|
228,7
|
|
Coke dust
|
20
|
800
|
160,0
|
|
Binder
|
10
|
900
|
90,0
|
|
Total
|
100
|
|
572,4
|
|
Refining costs, (pilot factory), rubles
|
|
|
300,0
|
|
Net cost of briquette
|
|
|
872,4
|
The chemical
composition of the briquette:
Fetotal =52,14%; Ñ=19,37%; ÑàÎ=8,17%; SiO2
=12,56%; MgO=0,38%.
The predicted
and expected effect from the usage of the iron-carbon briquette:
- cost
reduction of pig-iron on 92,2 rubles/t;
lowering of the coke
rate on 58 kg /t;
increase of productivity at 4,6 %;
owing to:
the substitution of a part of metallurgical coke by coke breeze of the
iron-carbon containing briquette;
implication of agglomerate finely cut cheap iron-containing
materials into the blast furnace mix material and returning pig-iron swaftagglomerated.
a quick pay-back of the vibropress equipment: from 2 up to 8 months.
Table 5.1.2
The comparative calculation of the
net price of foundry pig-iron with the traditional mix material (basic) and
with the usage of briquettes ÁÆÓ – Ä 52/19.
|
|
Index name
|
Basic,
kg/t
|
Cost, rubles
|
With briquettes, ru/t
|
Cost, rubles
|
Price, rubles/t
|
|
1.
|
Coke
|
630
|
945
|
572
|
858
|
1500,00
|
|
2.
|
Agglomerate
|
700
|
339,5
|
785
|
380,7
|
485,00
|
|
3.
|
Blast furnace pellets
|
585
|
288,5
|
580
|
253,6
|
488,98
|
|
4.
|
Fine metal additive
|
271
|
247,9
|
--
|
--
|
914,89
|
|
5.
|
Iron-carbon briquette
|
--
|
--
|
271
|
236,4
|
872,40
|
|
6.
|
Blast furnace ore
|
72
|
11,5
|
72
|
11,5
|
159,86
|
|
7.
|
Manganese ore
|
23
|
76,4
|
23
|
76,4
|
3322,00
|
|
|
Net cost of iron, rubles
|
|
1908,8
|
|
1816,6
|
- 92,2
|
|
The specified parameters in the calculation
|
|
|
Si,%
|
2,0
|
|
2,0
|
|
|
|
|
CaO/SiO2
|
0,99
|
|
0,99
|
|
|
|
|
RO/ SiO2
|
1,12
|
|
1,12
|
|
|
|
|
Fluid-dissolved iron, kg (without metal additives)
|
1380
|
|
1460
|
|
|
|
|
Femet, calculated %
|
54,87
|
|
55,03
|
|
|
Today we have
the opportunity to bring to the notice of ecologists our development. We hope that
in the result of cooperation this technology will occupy a worthy place in the
Russian science and economy.

The calculation
of the economic effectiveness of production of briquettes ÁÆÓ–Ñ 45/19 in
steel-making production is shown in Table 5.2.1.
From this table
we can see that the actual cost of the briquette is much lower than its
metallurgical value (2945 rubles – 1534 rubles = 1411 rubles) and the
effectiveness of its usage in recalculation for a ton of iron is 1411 rubles.
The cost efficiency of the briquette usage in the
blast-furnace and steel-making production will be much higher than mentioned
here, as we had to buy industrial waste and transport it to the place of briquetting. At any plant (or near) there are accumulated
over the decades reserves of raw material at a minimal cost.
Table 5.2.1 The
calculation of the briquette production effectiveness
(ÁÆÓ - Ñ 45/19)
|
Pig iron
|
Briquette ÁÆÓ - Ñ 45/19
|
|
1. The content of the components (% by mass):
|
|
Fe
- 95,0
|
Fe – 45,0 C – 19,0
|
|
Ñ - 4,5
|
CaO –
9,2 MgO
– 0,7
|
|
Mn, Si, S, P and others
- 0,5
|
SiO2, P2O5, S and others – 26,1
|
|
2. The market value for a ton of the material, rubles:
|
|
3100-00
|
Scale
– 300-00 (247-50)*
|
|
|
Coke breeze – 800-00 (220-00)*
|
|
|
Binder
– 600-00 (66-00)*
|
|
|
Costs for a ton of briquette refining - 200
|
|
|
Total:
727-50
|
|
|
( )*- the cost of the material
in briquette
|
|
3. The calculation of the one ton cost by iron, rubles:
|
|
2945-00
|
1534-00
|
|
4. Efficiency factor by carbon, standard unit:
|
|
1,0
|
1,0…1,5
|
When using
pig-iron for steel smelting in the arc electric furnace 50 kg of iron is turned
into liquid melt (without the waste).
When using ÁÆÓ-Ñ 45/19 the most
part of carbon will be needed for reduction of ferric oxides. The residual
content of carbon, turning into melt, will be 1,5…2,5%
(according to the results of the meltings in the laboratory oven). The actual
residual content of carbon in the melt is much higher than the results of the
experimental-industrial melts in the open-hearth ovens at “Taganrog
Metallurgical Plant” Plc. and “Viksa Metallurgical Plant” Plc.
We should note
that we did not consider the detrimental effect of the additives of briquette,
silicon dioxide, sulphur dioxide and phosphor dioxide, presence of which is
determined by the chemical composition of briquette components.
Nevertheless, from Table 5.2.3. we can see
that the economical practicability of the briquette production and usage is
obvious and can reach 100%.
In this
calculation the market value of pig iron and briquette components is meant.
Every plant has
the opportunity to evaluate its own effectiveness based on the traditionally
existing price level and level of costs.

Experimental-industrial
fusions of products of industrial waste utilization with a partial substitution
of metallurgical charge by iron-carbon-containing briquettes, produced according
to the technology of “EcoMashGeo” Ltd. with the usage as the main component of
iron and carbonic waste were carried out in open-hearth furnaces of “Liepajas
Metalurgs” Stock Corporation (Latvia),
“Taganrog Metallurgical Plant” Plc. (Taganrog), “Viksa Metallurgical Plant”
Plc. (Viksa), in electric furnaces of “Byelorussian Metallurgical Plant”
Republican Unitary Plant (Byelorussia), “Moscow Metallurgical Plant “Serp i Molot” Plc. (Moscow),
“Tiazhpromarmatura” Plc. (Aleksin), in shaft furnaces of “Hanino Ironworks”
Close Corporation (Suvorov).

The usage of
briquettes in blast furnaces as one of the charge components is actual for metallurgical plants that do not have their own
agglomerates or that do not have sufficient production of agglomerates.
In this case
the usage of briquettes ensures partial or total refusal from introduction of
raw flux due to optimal basicity of briquettes. Of course, presence of carbon
on briquettes helps to reduce the consumption of the most expensive component
of blast furnace charge, i.e. coke.
That is why one
of the first plants that used metallurgical briquettes in blast furnace melting
was “Lipetsk Metallurgical
Plant “Svobodni Sokol”” Plc., whose blast furnaces are
run on the charge that consists of blast furnace pellets and raw fluxes.
In May, 2002 at
“LMP “Svobodni Sokol”” Plc. a series of balance meltings with briquettes was
carried out. From the meltings results the metallurgical characteristics and
possibilities of smelting of iron-coke briquettes in blast furnace were
analyzed. Briquettes consisted of metal shiftings of
ferrovanadium production and coke breeze. The peculiarity of these briquettes
is that coke breeze isn’t meant for reduction of ferric oxides within
briquettes. Coke breeze is a lump filler, thus the problem of utilization is solved. In
blast furnace fusion carbon of coke breeze takes part in the process of
reduction of ferric oxides from intermediate slag.
Metallurgical
characteristics of iron-coke briquettes that were produced according to the
technology of “EcoMahGeo” Ltd. at “Tulit” Plc. from three types of man-caused raw material:
metal shiftings of ferrovanadium production (B 1),
swarf (B 2) and roll scale (B Ç) were
analyzed. Component composition of the charge for production of these
briquettes was the same: iron-containing component - 59%, coke breeze - 26%, portland cement - 15%.
Chemical composition of briquettes calculated on the basis of their elemental
composition that was defined in test- analytical center Giredmeta
is shown in Table 6.1.1.
Table 6.1.1.
Chemical composition of iron-coke
briquettes.
|
Briquette type
|
Fe met
|
FeO
|
Fe2O3
|
C
|
MnO
|
SiO2
|
Al2O3
|
CaO
|
MgO
|
SO3
|
P2O5
|
TiO2
|
V2O5
|
H2O
hydrated
|
|
Á 1
|
47,92
|
1,26
|
1,18
|
18,65
|
0,68
|
4,93
|
1,53
|
8,75
|
0,46
|
0,13
|
0,03
|
0,31
|
0,49
|
13,04
|
|
Á 2
|
48,68
|
-
|
1,18
|
20,67
|
0,31
|
4,35
|
1,53
|
8,66
|
0,46
|
0,13
|
0,03
|
0.03
|
-
|
13,04
|
|
Á 3
|
0,47
|
32,8
|
18,63
|
18,67
|
0,54
|
4,35
|
1,64
|
8,66
|
0,46
|
0,15
|
0,06
|
0,04
|
-
|
13,04
|
To define reducibility
of briquettes in accordance with GOST 21707-76, the change of mass of the
sample in the process of reduction by hydrogen at the temperature 800 ºÑ and consumption of reduction gas 1,5 l/min was constantly under control. It was
established that small amount of ferric oxides in briquettes B1 and B2 are
reduced in the first minutes of fusion, briquettes B3
are completely reduced within 40 minutes.
Heat stability
of briquettes was defined on the installation of Moscow State Institute of
Steel and Alloys of the change of layer height (60 mm) of the material with
fineness 5-8 mm at heating in the reducing atmosphere at the speed of 14 °Ñ/min during the first 45 min, and then at the speed of 5-6 °Ñ/min. By heating the sample up to 900 °Ñ the consumption
of reduction gas Í2 è N3 was 0,3 and 1,1 l/min, at the temperature
more than 900 °Ñ - 1,1 è 0,3 l/min correspondingly. Pressure is being raised from Î to 65 kilo-Pascal. It was established that by heating in the range from
900 to 1300 °Ñ iron-coke
briquettes practically do not grow soft. At the same time, briquettes B3 grow
soft to a greater extend than briquettes B2, but to a lesser extend than
traditional iron-ore raw material. The cause is the structure of briquettes
that is created at heating in deoxidizing atmosphere: iron matrix form caked
particles of iron (initial and reduced) that includes pieces of coke within
casing from refractory calcium-aluminosilicates.
Heating in the
reducing atmosphere at the speed of 500 °Ñ/h to 1000 °Ñ and at the speed of 50 °Ñ/h to 1150 °Ñ with the following cooling in inert atmosphere to 40-50 °Ñ did not influence the shape and dimensions of iron-coke briquettes from
metal shifting. Small cracks (10-15 mm) appeared on the surface.
So the results
of the tests show that iron-coke briquettes are suitable for fusion in blast
furnace, where they preserve their shape and dimensions
at the temperature 1250-1300 °Ñ.
Pilot meltings
with the usage of iron-coke briquettes in the charge were carried out in blast
furnace ¹ 1 at “LMP “Svobodni Sokol”” Plc. (payload volume 700 m3,
12 jets, feeding of charge to skip by scale car). Furnace operates on imported
coke and smelts foundry iron and pig iron from Lebedian pellets with the usage of
limestone and dolomite as fluxes. By smelting pig iron for a partial
substitution of coke schungite up to 100kg/t was used. A small amount of metal
additions and manganese ore was also used (Table 6.1.2).
Pilot meltings
with the usage of iron-coke briquettes in the charge were carried out at the
beginning of the work for open-hearth pig iron. In two days it was switched to
smelting of foundry iron. The loading of briquettes was stopped and renewed
only in three days. 500 tons of briquettes were partially melted for smelting
of open-hearth pig iron and partially for smelting for foundry iron. It did not
negatively influenced on the work of the furnace. It is a well known fact that
the averaging of information on the work of the furnace during the period less
than 5-7 days always distorts the figures of discharge intensity of raw
materials and fuel because of the reasons not connected with the melting
technology.
Table 6.1.2. Chemical composition of
charge materials used at smelting pig iron and foundry iron in blast furnace, %
|
Materials
|
Få
|
SiO2
|
À120ç
|
ÑàÎ
|
ÌgÎ
|
Ìï
|
Ð
|
W, %
|
|
Pellets
Lebedian
|
65,73
|
5,96
|
0,45
|
0,3
|
0,5
|
0,053
|
0,020
|
2,6
|
|
Ore
Michailovsk
|
37,51
|
47,81
|
0,74
|
0,84
|
0,51
|
0,03
|
0,061
|
1,15
|
|
manganese ore
|
5,77
|
14,27
|
2,92
|
3,52
|
1,13
|
38,07
|
0,151
|
11,4
|
|
Limestone
|
0,50
|
1,02
|
0,90
|
52,91
|
0,79
|
-
|
-
|
1,40
|
|
Dolomite
|
1,38
|
1,6
|
0,84
|
31,36
|
19,30
|
-
|
-
|
2,10
|
Taking this
into consideration, for evaluation of impact of the usage of briquettes in the
charge on technical and economic indices of furnace functioning and for
reduction of distortion of information about furnace functioning, average
weighted by iron mass basic and trial periods were formed. Basic period covered
3 days of furnace functioning on pig iron before the usage of briquettes and 3
days on foundry iron after the end of usage of briquettes, trial period covered
2 days of furnace functioning on pig iron and 5 days on foundry iron with the
usage of iron coke briquettes (Table 6.1.3). It was stated that the usage of
iron coke briquettes in the charge in
quantity of 51,83 kg/t had lead to capacity increase of the furnace by 91,71
t/day and to reduction of coke consumption by 6,14 kg/t.
Evaluation of
the impact of iron coke briquettes B1 on technical and economic indices of
furnace functioning was done by computer simulation blast furnace fusion for
the conditions of basic and trial periods with the usage of B1 in quantity of
69,5 and iron 260 kg/t. For adaptation of the mathematical model to the
functioning conditions of blast furnace ¹ 1 at “LMP “Svobodni Sokol”” Plc.
average rates of the basic period to which the results of simulation were
compared, were used. (Table 6.1.4.).
Table 6.1.3.
Basic indexes of functioning
of blast furnace at
“LMP
“Svobodni Sokol”” Plc. with the usage of iron coke briquettes by smelting pig
and foundry iron in basic and trial periods.
|
Index
|
periods
|
Change
of index
|
∆ coke, kg/t
|
∆
capacity,
t/day
|
|
basic
|
trial
|
|
Capacity, t/day
|
1009,97
|
966,65
|
-43,32
|
--
|
--
|
|
Shutdown,
%
|
0,09
|
0,56
|
+0,47
|
-1,24
|
+7,12
|
|
Slow
speed, %
|
0,897
|
1,97
|
+1,073
|
-2,84
|
16,3
|
|
discharge
intensity of dry skip coke, kg/t
|
529,64
|
558,99
|
+29,34
|
--
|
--
|
|
Iron in
iron-ore part of the charge, %
|
65,94
|
65,3
|
-0,64
|
-3,39
|
+12,3
|
|
Material
consumption, kg/t:
|
|
|
pellets,
Lebedian ore mining and processing enterprise
|
1307,2
|
1481,9
|
+174,7
|
--
|
--
|
|
iron
ore
|
--
|
8,344
|
+8,344
|
--
|
--
|
|
metallurgical
briquettes
|
--
|
51,83
|
+51,83
|
--
|
--
|
|
plant
scrap
|
185,04
|
8,977
|
-176,1
|
-16,8
|
+53,3
|
|
manganese ore
|
7,51
|
11,99
|
+4,48
|
--
|
--
|
|
schungite
|
12,74
|
37,07
|
-24,37
|
+19,5
|
--
|
|
limestone
|
108,76
|
121,72
|
+12,96
|
-3,43
|
+6,5
|
|
dolomite
|
67,07
|
91,7
|
+24,63
|
-5,21
|
+9,9
|
|
Blast
temperature, °Ñ
|
1029,18
|
993
|
-36,18
|
-7,68
|
+14,64
|
|
Natural
gas consumption, m3/t
|
64,21
|
54,81
|
-9,4
|
-7,52
|
--
|
|
Top
smoke pressure, atmosphere
|
0,71
|
0,742
|
+0,032
|
+0,33
|
-0,3
|
|
Content
in iron,%:
|
|
|
Si
|
1,671
|
2,049
|
+0,378
|
-4,45
|
+8,48
|
|
Mn
|
0,247
|
0,405
|
+0,158
|
-1,673
|
+0,319
|
|
S
|
0,022
|
0,022
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
|
Basicity
of slag (CaO/SiO2)
|
1,02
|
1,031
|
+0,011
|
--
|
--
|
|
Slag
volume, kg/t
|
243,92
|
249,64
|
+5,72
|
-1,059
|
+3,43
|
|
Given
coke consumption, kg/t
|
529,64
|
523,5
|
--
|
-35,5
|
--
|
|
Reduced
capacity, t/day
|
1009,97
|
1101,68
|
--
|
--
|
+135,00
|
Notes:
1. The factor
of substitution of coke by schungite is 0,8 kg/kg
according to the content of Si in trial period.
∆ coke and è ∆ capacity are the changes
of coke consumption and blast furnace capacity by the usage of iron coke
briquettes.
The results have proven the high effectiveness
of the usage of iron coke briquettes: reduction of coke consumption and
increase of furnace capacity at reduction of pellets consumption per iron
smelting. For briquettes B1 the factor of substitution of coke by briquettes is
0,40-0,41 kg/kg. Reduction of coke consumption is achieved
due to the following factors:
- direct
substitution of coke carbon by carbon in briquettes and carbon that takes part
in the reaction of gasification and in direct reduction of carbon from ferrous
initial and intermediate slag;
- owing to partial withdrawal of limestone from the charge due
to high basicity of iron coke briquettes;
- absence of heat consumption for direct reduction of carbon
in briquettes, that goes into the furnace
as reduced iron.
Increase of
capacity of the furnace and the usage of iron coke briquettes are not so
essential and caused mainly by reduction of coke consumption, i.e. increase of
ore load. Caloricity of top smoke increased by 0,2
mega-joule/m3) by using iron coke briquettes in the quantity of 260
kg/t.
On the basis of
the above-stated we can come to the following conclusions:
iron coke
briquettes on cement binder produced from fine-dyspersated metal
siftings of ferrovanadium production or from metal swarf have high heat
resistance, do not fall apart at high heating speed in reducing atmosphere
under the loads characteristic of blast furnace conditions and are high quality
complex raw material for blast furnace, that contains metallic carbon, reducing
agent and fluxing components.
iron coke briquettes production on cement binder helps to solve the problem
of recycling of coke breeze and fine-dyspersated metallic waste of the plants
that do not have an agglofactory.
the usage of briquettes can be effective in furnaces that work on nonfluxed
iron-ore raw material with the usage of limestone and dolomite. Moreover,
iron-coke briquettes reduce the content of oxygen in the charge and increase CO
in top smoke and its caloricity that can be used in special technological
regimes of blast-furnace fusion with the purpose of obtaining top smoke of
necessary composition in blast furnace.
Table 6.1.4
The results of computer simulation of blast furnace
fusion with the usage of iron coke briquettes.
|
Index
|
Periods
|
|
basic
|
trial 1
|
trial 2
|
|
Material
consumption, kg/t:
|
|
|
Pellelts (Lebedian)
|
1241,7
|
1192,6
|
1043,9
|
|
metal
additive
|
175,8
|
173,1
|
174
|
|
limestone
|
103,3
|
80,7
|
46,0
|
|
dolomite
|
63,7
|
56,6
|
54,5
|
|
schungite
|
12,2
|
-
|
-
|
|
manganese
ore
|
7,2
|
7,1
|
7,1
|
|
briquettes
B1
|
-
|
69,5
|
262
|
|
coke
|
529,3
|
500,6
|
432,3
|
|
Natural
gas consumption,m3/t
|
65,8
|
65,8
|
65,8
|
|
Blasting:
|
|
|
consumption, m3/t
|
1595
|
1533
|
1456
|
|
temperature, °Ñ
|
1029
|
1029
|
1029
|
|
humidity, gr/m3
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
|
Top
smoke pressure, kiloPascal
|
170
|
170
|
170
|
|
Discharge
of top smoke, m3/t
|
2307
|
2216
|
2101
|
|
Gas caloticity, mega-joule/m3
|
3,48
|
3,55
|
3,76
|
|
Slag:
|
|
|
discharge, kg/t
|
233
|
213
|
206,6
|
|
basicity (ÑàÎ/SiO2)
|
0,997
|
0,998
|
0,998
|
|
Contents, %:
|
|
|
ÌgÎ
|
9,26
|
9,28
|
9,30
|
|
[Si]
|
1,67
|
1,67
|
1,67
|
|
[S]
|
0,021
|
0,022
|
0,022
|
|
Capacity, t/day
|
1002
|
1042
|
1095
|
The next
meltings with the usage of metallurgical briquettes were carried out at
“Tulachermet” Plc., the biggest manufacturer of pig
iron.
From 18, November to 26, December, 2002
at blast furnace ¹2 489 tons of briquettes with the following component
composition were smelted:
roll scale - 92%;
binder - 8%.
Technologists
of “Tulachermet” Plc. offered such composition of briquettes because of the
lack of flue cinder that is the most effective material for washing of blast
furnace forge. Problems with blocking the forge by graphite waste at blast
furnace ¹2 occasionally arose after a long functioning of furnace. This
campaign of the usage of washing briquettes produced the following results:
the usage of briquettes from scale as washing material did not negatively
influence on the course of blast-furnace process;
the positive factors are stabilization of consumption of cold blast and
reduction of heat variation, more even discharge of fusion products.
We should note
that “Tulachermet” Plc. was the first plant in Russia that led that
work on development of different compositions of metallurgical briquettes by
the method of cold briquetting and the technology of their application.
Laboratory tests were begun in September, 2001 together with “EcoMashGeo” Ltd.
We came to the
following conclusions according to the results of the laboratory tests:
briquettes, produced according to the technology of “EcoMashGeo”
Ltd. are manufacturable, mechanically strong, heat-resistant, allows
partial substitution of agglomerate and
blast-furnace coke;
briquettes allow to eliminate poorly balled components
(agglo-blast-furnace sludge and blast furnace dust), that will bring about
improvement of agglomerate durability and increase of productivity of agglomachines.
At the
beginning of 2003 the program of organization of metallurgical briquettes
production was accepted and on the 25th
of April, 2003 industrial production was begun. Metallurgical
briquettes consist of agglo-blast furnace sludge, blast furnace dust, coke
breeze, fine-fractional product of enrichment of slag-metal waste.
Today the work
on briquettes usage in blast furnace fusion at “Novolipetsk Metallurgical
Plant” Plc. is carried out, where the main goal is the effective utilization of
waste of all metallurgical refinings, starting with by-product-coking industry
finishing with rolling industry.
At
metallurgical plants where balance meltings with the usage of
carbon-iron-containing briquettes were carried out the ideology of industrial
waste utilization has been excepted.

At the end of
2000 – at the beginning of 2001 in the market of metal charge arose a situation
that had caused advance of prices on ferro-scrap. This fact stimulated
commercial and technical services of the plants where scrap metal was used for
steel smelting to start looking for alternative material.
For such plant
as “Byelorussian Metallurgical Plant” Republican Unitary Plant that is situated
in the republic where there are limited resources of ferro-scrap, this problem
is one of the urgent ones.
Besides that,
accumulated reserves of roll scale (about 5 million tons with 30 thousand tons
a year) and dust of gas purification (about 20 thousand tons a year) that are
practically not realized after dissolution of the USSR, have a ecological
influence on the environment.
We should
notice that average iron content in the mentioned waste is less than 50%, in
scale it is 72%.
Hence, the
technological series of production and application of iron-fuel briquettes in
the charge for electrosmelting is solely acceptable for “Byelorussian
Metallurgical Plant” Republican Unitary Plant, at the same time high economic
results are obtained.
On the 11th of July, 2002 “EcoMashGeo”
Ltd. received roll scale from “Byelorussian Metallurgical Plant” Republican
Unitary Plant, that became the basic component for
briquettes. In August five types of iron-carbon-containing briquettes (60 tons
of each) according to the described technology (ÒÓ
0320-002-55978394-01) were produced.
Compressive
resistance of the briquettes was 15,3 – 15,6 mPa, accessible porosity 15-16%.
To define
mechanical strength of briquettes the following methods were used:
- in accordance with
GOST 2787-75;
- in accordance with the method, adapted to the real
conditions of steelmaking at
“Byelorussian Metallurgical Plant” Republican Unitary Plant.
The briquettes
have successfully passed the test on mechanical strength according the two
methods, i.e. weight loss according to GOST 2787 was 2,7%
after ten drops: 5,8% with fraction output
– 5 mm, in wasted mass – 3,6%.
Table 6.2.1.
Component and chemical composition
of briquettes.
|
Batch index
|
Component composition, % by mass
|
Chemical analysis, % by mass
|
|
Variant ¹1
ÁÆÓ 50/16.19
Net weight 65 t
Car ¹67006225
|
Roll scale – 69,0
Carbonic material – 21,8
Binder – 9,2
|
Fetotal –
50,15
CuO
– 4,90
MgO
– 0,70
K2O+Na2O – 0,07
Al2O3 –
0,10
P2O5 –
0,01
|
C – 16,10
SiO2 – 2,90
S – 0,25
MnO
– 0,30
Cr2O3 -
0,06
TiO2 – 0,09
|
|
Variant ¹2
ÁÆÓ 51/16.19
Net weight 65 t
Car ¹67006225
|
Roll scale – 69,0
Carbonic material – 21,8
Binder – 9,2
|
Fetotal –
50,10
CuO
– 4,95
MgO
– 0,68
K2O+Na2O – 0,07
Al2O3 –
1,08
P2O5 –
0,01
|
C – 16,00
SiO2 – 2,98
S – 0,24
MnO –
0,29
Cr2O3- 0,06
TiO2 – 0,09
|
|
Variant ¹3
ÁÓÆ 51/15.19
Net weight 65 t
Car ¹64331259
|
Roll scale – 70,7
Carbonic material – 20,1
Binder – 9,2
|
Fetotal –
51,95
CuO
– 4,85
MgO
– 0,84
K2O+Na2O – 0,08
Al2O3 –
1,11
P2O5 –
0,01
|
C – 15,12
SiO2 – 2,89
S – 0,21
MnO –
0,28
Cr2O3- 0,06
TiO2 – 0,09
|
|
Variant ¹4
ÁÆÓ 54/17.19
Net weight 65 t
Car ¹62740023
|
Roll scale – 46,0
Carbonic material – 21,8
Binder – 9,2
Metal additive– 23,0
|
Fetotal –
54,25
CuO
– 4,89
MgO
– 0,88
K2O+Na2O – 0,07
Al2O3 –
1,08
P2O5 –
0,02
|
C – 17,2
SiO2 – 3,40
S – 0,30
MnO –
0,35
Cr2O3- 0,06
TiO2 – 0,09
|
|
Variant ¹5
ÁÆÓ 51/19.19
Net weight 65 t
Car ¹63903256
|
Roll scale – 69,0
Carbonic material – 28,8
Binder – 9,2
|
Fetotal– 51,16
CuO
– 5,0
MgO
– 0,85
K2O+Na2O – 0,07
Al2O3 –
0,60
P2O5 –
0,009
|
C – 19,8
SiO2 – 2,10
S – 0,20
MnO –
0,32
Cr2O3 - 0,06
TiO2 – 0,09
|
Definition of
temperature conditions of softening was done on laboratory-scale plant for the
definition of temperature conditions of softening of iron-ore materials by GOST
26517-85 in nitrogen current. We have obtained the following results:
temperature of the beginning of softening - 995 îÑ;
temperature of the end of softening - 1400 îÑ;
temperature interval of softening - 405 îÑ.
(for Variants ¹1, 2, 3, 5)
Briquettes were loaded on “the
pillow” made of light scrap weighing 5-7 tons into the basket 1 and 2. By loading, a partial collapse of corners and
edges of briquettes was observed. Briquettes were settled around the periphery
of the basket rather compactly, similarly to pig iron loading. Melting of metal
charge was carried out in the regime of traditional technology.
Required
assortment and chemical composition of the first test where the briquettes were
used are shown in Table 6.2.2. For comparison in the period of test the same
amount of the same steel grades with practically the same metal charge
composition, but without briquettes where the contents of Ñ, Ð, S at smelting
were defined.
Mass share of
briquettes was counted depending on the necessary content of carbon in metal at
melting. At analyzing the results of chemical analysis in trial meltings with
briquettes and comparative meltings without briquettes the growth of percentage
of carbon content is observed. For example, in 20 pilot meltings of steel ñò3ñï, the average
content of carbon is 0,23 %, at the same time in 24
meltings of the same steel grade without the briquettes the content of carbon
in the first test was 0,14 %.
In the same
way, the growth of carbon content in the steel grades ñò1ñï, 25Ã2Ñ, 460Â was observed.
The analysis of the meltings with and without briquettes shows that the growth
of carbon content at melting varies and is in the range from 0,05 % to 0,09 %. That depends on different contents of
carbon in briquettes.
The process of reduction was
perfectly seen when by manual loading of briquettes (5-7 pieces) in to liquid
melt of tank the bulbs of gas, that instantly flared
up due to afterburning of CO, escaped.
Table 6.2.2.
Characteristics of meltings with the
usage of briquettes and without them.
|
With the usage of briquettes
|
Without the usage of briquettes
|
|
Steel grade
|
Number of fusions, pieces.
|
Average number of briquettes per fusion, kg.
|
Average content by mass,%
|
Steel grade
|
Number of fusions, pieces.
|
Average content by mass, %
|
|
C
|
P
|
S
|
Ñ
|
Ð
|
S
|
|
Ñò3 ñï
|
20
|
4800
|
0,23
|
0,007
|
0,047
|
Ñò 3 ñï
|
24
|
0,14
|
0,003
|
0,041
|
|
Ñò1 ñï
|
16
|
4700
|
0,17
|
0,006
|
0,048
|
Ñò1 ñï
|
18
|
0,12
|
0,004
|
0,039
|
|
25Ã2Ñ
|
13
|
5000
|
0,18
|
0,007
|
0,042
|
460Â
|
18
|
0,13
|
0,003
|
0,043
|
|
SAE1008
|
2
|
4500
|
0,12
|
0,008
|
0,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AT500C
|
4
|
4700
|
0,24
|
0,007
|
0,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ñò 3 ñï
|
3
|
4200
|
0,13
|
0,006
|
0,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20Ã2
|
1
|
4800
|
0,15
|
0,005
|
0,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
59
|
|
Total:
|
60
|
|
In Table 6.2.3
the average value of fusion regimes of steel of pilot and comparative meltings
is shown.
The data of Table 6.2.3. show that the average
specific power consumption for the fusions with the usage of briquettes is 0,63
kW/t higher than in the comparative fusion, that is 0,2 %, i.e. average specific power
consumption are practically the same. Slight surplus can be explained by
unstable work of furnaces 1 and 2 during the test due to the lack of metal
charge. Although power consumption is forecast to be lower.
Table 6.2.3.
Average value of regimes of fusions
of steel of pilot and comparative meltings.
|
Fusion,
amount
|
Average measures
|
|
Specific power consumption, kW/ton of liquid
|
Specific power consumption, kW/ton of hot
|
Discharge intensity of ÑàÎ,
kg/ton of hot
|
Discharge intensity of coke,
kg/ton of hot
|
Discharge intensity of Î2, m3/ton of hot
|
Output of useful, %
|
Discharge intensity of metal charge, kg/òã
|
|
Pilot
(59 fusions)
|
514,38
|
523,12
|
61,24
|
4,42
|
15,64
|
87,93
|
1142,9
|
|
Comparative
(60 fusions)
|
509,83
|
522,49
|
51,65
|
5,41
|
12,89
|
88,09
|
1140,6
|
Great increase
(9,59 kg/ton of hot) of discharge intensity of lime at
pilot meltings can be explained by the fact
that in the initial stage of liquid phase formation by smelting about 30-50 %
of metal charge of basket 1 and especially by smelting basket 2 a rapid
formation of foamy slag was seen. The slag flows by gravity in to slag pot that
is why frequent lime additive for scorification was needed. (This problem can
be solved by increasing the height of sill of inspection window). The electric
furnace was working properly, without uncovering of electric arc.
Beneficial effect of the early
formation of foamy slag influences the process of oxidation of solid particles
of carbon within the briquettes with ÑÎ formation,
what later on by using in the briquette charge will allow to get a considerable
decrease of specific energy consumption and coke consumption, what was observed
at several fusions where the specific power consumption was 498-506 kW/ton of
finished product.
Low percent of finished product and
high specific consumption of metal charge are explained by the fact that during
the test in the component part of the charge of pilot and comparative fusions
20-30 % of light scrap and 5,0 of swarf were used,
that considerably increases the percent of loss. Swarf should be included in
the content of briquettes by production of the following batch.
So, we can come to the following
conclusions:
oxide-carbonic briquette is a new charge that partially or
completely replaces pig-iron or scrap metal;
briquettes froth slag and ensure earlier and more profound
shielding of electric arcs;
briquettes have regular shape and weight, have good durability
and transportability;
usage of oxide-iron waste for production of briquettes for steel melting is a
real way of resource economy;
briquettes improve deoxidizing atmosphere in furnace.
So, doubtless manufacturability of
the new type of charge, i.e. iron-carbon-containing briquettes and the
possibility to perfect metallurgical characteristics with the purpose of
improving performance characteristics of fusion and expansion of range of the
charge for electric furnace steelmaking.

The lack of
metallurgical scrap, high price on carbonic material, impossibility to apply
fine-dyspersated and fine-fractional material – this is a concise list of the
problems of metallurgists of open-hearth furnace.
Pilot fusions
with the usage of metallurgical briquettes of different compositions were
carried out in open-hearth furnaces of the following metallurgical plants:
- “Taganrog Metallurgical
Plant” Plc. (Taganrog), Russia;
- “Liepajas
Metalurgs” Stock Corporation, Latvia;
- “Viksa Metallurgical Plant”
Plc. (Viksa), Russia.
As a result of
meltings the following conclusions have been drawn:
briquettes can be used as a charge component of open-hearth
process for furnaces that work as scrap practice;
iron from
scale, being a component of briquette, is reduced and absorbed by molten metal,
that is proved by high percentage of finished products, low content of iron
oxides in the slag after the end of the melting period;
molten scale has higher (compared to traditional charge fusions) basicity,
that indicates the possibility of reduction of lime (limestone) consumption in
charging;
the results of meltings where briquettes partially replaced hard iron show
that there is a possibility to substitute 1,5 tons of hard iron by 2 tons of
briquettes in the charge;
wisely selected schemes of packing and loading of briquettes allow to
completely mechanize loading-transporting operations and to reduce the time of
furnace charging.

In spite of
development of the technology of hot metal for casting of products in electric
furnaces (arc and induction) traditional cupolas are widely spread not only in Russia, but in other
countries because of process economy.
Traditional
charge for copula is pig iron, whose production is often situated far from
foundries. Besides, by pig iron smelting in cupolas and by following processing
of castings certain amount of iron cuttings and coke breeze is generated.
The mentioned
waste is not straight claimed.
In this case
production of metallurgical briquettes from foundry waste can be a cheap and
technologically effective way of utilization with the purpose of substitution
of a part of pig iron in the charge for cupolas.
“EcoMashGeo”
Ltd. together with “Hanino
Ironworks” Close Corporation have developed the composition of metallurgical
briquette and the technology of application of briquettes for pig iron smelting
in coke cupola.
In 2002 a
series of pilot meltings was carried out in coke cupolas of the plant.
The results of
the meltings help to come to the conclusion of the possible replacement (up to
50%) of pig iron and 100% replacement of raw fluxes in the traditional charge.
A separate
direction of metallurgical briquettes usage is the usage of ferroalloys for
smelting of pig iron of the given composition.
“Extreme”
development of this direction is a new technology of utilization “ÎxiCup”, offered by the concern “ThyssenKrupp” and its partners - “Mannesmann”, “Kuttner”,
“B.U.S.” and “Messer Griesheim”. That is the process
of industrial waste utilization in a special metallurgical set, a modernized
cupola. In the process pig iron is obtained from the charge that contains of
carbon-fuel briquettes by 70%.
This direction
is urgent for the regions where there is a traditional lack of pig iron
production and reserve capacity for obtaining hot metal in cupolas.

Lately pilot
meltings with metallurgical briquettes of various compositions in blast
furnace, open-hearth, electric furnace steelmaking, induction
furnace refinings have been carried out.
For all meltings effective reduction
of oxides of iron by carbonic component of briquettes, that
coincides with the results of researches of metallurgists of Europe as well as
high predictability of fusion process with the usage of briquettes of various
compositions is noted.
For today
“EcoMashGeo” Ltd. has worked out (and is carrying out) compositions from the
given by plants waste and material for plants of Russia, Ukraine, Europe, South America in laboratory
environment.
Table 7.1.
Introduction of metallurgical
briquettes.
|
|
plant
|
time
|
refining
characteristics
|
tons
|
briquette
components
|
|
1
|
“Taganrog
Metallurgical Plant” Plc., Taganrog, Russia
|
09.2001
|
open-hearth furnace 285 t
|
350
|
roll
scale, coke
breeze
|
|
2
|
“Liepajas
Metalurgs” Stock Corporation, Liepaja, Latvia
|
10.2001
|
open-hearth furnace 200 t
|
200
|
roll
scale, coke
breeze
|
|
3
|
“Liepajas
Metalurgs” Stock Corporation, Liepaja, Latvia
|
02.2002
|
open-hearth furnace 200 t
|
40
|
roll
scale, carbonic material, gas purifier dust
|
|
4
|
“Viksa Metallurgical Plant” Plc., Viksa, Russia
|
03.2002
|
open-hearth furnace 250 t
|
130
|
coke breeze, iron-containing material(Fe met -82%)
|
|
5
|
“Tiazhpromarmatura” Public Cooperation, Aleksin, Tula Region, Russia
|
08.2001
|
electric
arc furnace 6 t with acid lining
|
40
|
roll
scale, coke
breeze
|
|
6
|
“Moscow
Metallurgical Plant “Serp i Molot”
Plc., Moscow, Russia
|
08.2002
|
electric
arc furnace 12 t with acid lining, induction
1 t
|
25
|
roll scale, coke dust, iron-containing material (Fe met-82%)
|
|
7
|
“Hanino Ironworks” Close Corporation, Tula
region, Russia
|
09.2002
|
3 t
cupolas with fireclay lining
|
20
|
iron
swarf, roll scale, coke dust, iron-containing material Fe met-82%
|
|
8
|
“Byelorussian
Metallurgical Plant”, Republican Unitary Plant, Zhlobin, Byelorussia
|
12.2002-1.2003
|
electric
arc furnace 120 t with basic lining
|
350
|
roll
scale, iron and steel swarf, carbonic material
|
|
9
|
“Byelorussian
Metallurgical Plant”, Republican Unitary Plant, Zhlobin, Byelorussia
|
03.2003
|
electric
arc furnace 120 t with basic lining
|
570
|
roll
scale, coke breeze
|
|
10
|
“Lipetsk
Metallurgical Plant “Svobodni Sokol”” Plc., Lipetsk, Russia
|
05- 06. 2002
|
blast
furnace with payload volume of 700 m3
|
300
|
iron-containing
material Fe met-82%, carbonic material
|
|
11
|
“Tulachermet” Plc., Tula, Russia
|
01.2003
|
blast
furnace with payload volume of 1030 m3
|
300
|
roll
scale (for well washing)
|
|
12
|
“Novolipetsk Metallurgical Plant” Plc., Lipetsk, Russia
|
|
blast
furnace with payload volume of
|
2000
|
|
From March, 2003 “Byelorussian Metallurgical Plant”, Republican Unitary
Plant, Zhlobin, Byelorussia with “EcoMashGeo” Ltd.
have been producing iron-carbon-containing briquettes that effectively replace
in the traditional charge metallurgical scrap, carbonizer
using roll scale with high economic effect.

This technology
of industrial waste recycling was presented and won the recognition and support
at:
the 7th International Congress of Blast-furnace Men
that took place in September, 9-12, 2002 in Moscow-Cherepovez where the report
“Blast furnace in every briquette” was presented;
the 7th
Congress of Steelmakers that took place
in October, 14-18, 2002 in Magnitogorsk where the report on the subject “The
Technology and the Economy of Briquette Production from Fine-dyspersated Waste
of Metallurgical and By-product-coking Plants for Economically Sound Replacement
by it Traditional Mix Material of
Steel, Blast-furnace and Ferroalloy
Refinings and its Production Method”;
at the meeting
of mayors of the Central Federal region that was held in Tula in December, 6-8,
2002, where the report on the subject “The Initiative project of the program of
industrial waste recycling in the context of ecological doctrine of the Russian
Federation”;
at the business meeting of Byelorussia-Russia-Ukraine
– “The perspectives and ways of economic development” in the section “High-end
technologies and industrial cooperation” that was held in Tula in April, 8-11,
2003 where the report on the subject “The Initiative project of the program of
industrial waste recycling for reduction of natural resources consumption in
the countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States”.
The sixth chapter of the book “Engineering protection of the
environment. Water purification and waste utilization” written by U.A.Birman, N.G.Vurdova
(publishing house ASB, 2002) is devoted to the technology of cold sintering.
This book is
oriented for engineers, technicians and scientists of the developers,
operational and research organizations and is recommended as a manual for
institutions of higher education.
The authors of
the book think that:
“iron industry plants have
all the necessary background to become the core industry of utilization of all kind
of waste within the realization of the conception of the global recycling of
the man-caused materials”.
It is important
to underline that this technology was worked out within the priority lines of
the Ecological Doctrine of the Russian
Federation.

As mentioned
earlier, reserves of iron-carbon-containing waste of metallurgical, machine
building, mineral resource and chemical industries as well as fuel and energy
complex constitute about 80 billion tons. Every year about 7 billion tons of
waste is generated in Russia.
Our abundant
experience in using briquettes in metallurgical industry helps us to draw a
conclusion about the possibility to have in briquettes 30-90% of
iron-carbon-containing waste.
So,
the technology of “EcoMashGeo” Ltd. will allow not
only to recycle the present waste but also to liquidate slime fields and
iron-carbonic industrial waste within 8-10 years and to set free the areas of
usable land.
We offer
introduction of the technology of “EcoMashGeo” at industrial plants for solving
the problems of utilization of generated and current waste with the purpose of:
following reduction and liquidation of pollution of environment
by industrial waste;
- integration
of industrial and scientific potentials for solving the problem of waste
recycling;
economy of natural resources due to maximum involving of
waste into economic circulation;
- creation of
standard-technical data of the united national policy in the sphere of waste
management at all levels of management;
creation of control system of waste recycling and utilization.
Having the abundant experience in the sphere of
production organization and application of briquettes in metallurgical
industry, “EcoMashGeo” Ltd. will help you:
to define verges and volumes of man-caused waste
deposits of metallurgical, machine building, mineral resource and chemical
industries as well as fuel and energy complex
in any region of the Commonwealth of Independent States and abroad.
to define the economic and metallurgical value of briquettes for a
definite metallurgical plant, taking into consideration availability of dumps
with industrial waste;
to work through the technology of briquettes production for a definite
plant;
to make a pilot batch of briquettes from the given man-caused waste and to
do the technological accompaniment of balance meltings with the purpose of
getting a maximal economic effect for a definite metallurgical plant;
to help to buy, adjust and set up vibropression equipment (foreign and
native);
to guarantee service accompaniment of the processes of metallurgical
briquette production;
to guarantee a further service expansion in the sphere of developing of
the briquette technology in the metallurgical manufacture.
We offer cooperation!
A more detailed information on this technology of utilization (recycling) we
can get on our site:
http://www.briket.ru/
and by phones:
8 +7 (0872) 458 116
Koteniov Vasiliy Iliych
8 +7 (0872) 389 933 Barsukova Elena Yurievna
8 +7
(0872) 365 631 Kitaev
Alexander Alexandrovitch
our e-mail:mashgeo@tula.net

1. B.M.Ravich Briquetting in colour and iron and steel industry. Ì. "Metallurgy", 1975.
2. L.A.Lurie Briquetting
in metallurgy. Ì.
"Metallurgy",1963.
3. V.P.Bulgakov, G.V.Bulgakov The
research of the mineralogical content of the scale-carbonic briquettes during
the process of reduction. Ì. "Iron
and steel industry", 1998, ¹7
4. The report
by I.M.Mischenko Utilization of the agglomerate
carbon-containing metallurgical dust, "Pig iron production", 1998.
5. O.V.Yuzov, V.A.Isaev The analysis
of the expenditure of the base resources in iron and steel industry of Russia. "Steel" ¹10, 1999.
6. V.S. Lisin The tendencies of
re-structuring of iron and steel industry. "Steel"
¹10, 1999.
7. Patent for
invention ¹ 2183679. “Briquette for metallurgy industry,
briquette for furnace washing of the blast furnace and the method of briquette
production”.
8. Patent for
invention ¹ 2197544. “Briquette for metallurgical production
and the method of briquettes production”.
9. “Engineering
protection of the environment” edited by U.A.Birman, N.G.Vurdova, publishing house ASB, 2002, 296 p. with
illustrations.
Koteniov V.I., Kitaev À.À., Barsukova E.Y. Briquettes from fine-dyspersated
waste of metallurgical and by-product-coking industries are economically sound
substitution of traditional charge of metallurgical refining. – Ì.
“Metallurgist”, ¹ 10, 2002.
Koteniov V.I., Kitaev À.À., Barsukova E.Y., Republican Unitary Plant
“Byelorussian Metallurgical Plant”. The test of
introduction of iron-carbon-containing briquettes into electric furnace
steelmaking. – Ì. “Metallurgist”,
¹ 1, 2003.
Belkin A.S., Yusfin Y.S., Kurunov
I.Ph. and others. The usage
of iron-coke briquettes on a cement binder in blast furnace.–
Ì. “Metallurgist”, ¹ 4, 2003.
Operation of
Charcoal Blast Furnaces in Brasil, Montairo L.C. Steel Times 2000. ¹5.Ñ. 176, 180.
OxiCup Process for Recycling Steel Mill Waste Oxides Von Vambuler,
C.B., Peters M., Shueller R.H., AISE Steel
Technology. 2002.79. ¹ 5. C.49-52.
Koteniov V.I., Kitaev À.À., Barsukova E.Y. Blast furnace in every
briquette. Materials of the 7th International
Congress of Blast-furnace Men. Moscow, 2002.
Koteniov V.I., Kitaev À.À., Barsukova E.Y The Technology and the Economy of Briquette
Production from Fine-dyspersated Waste of
Metallurgical and
By-product-coking Plants for
Economically Sound Replacement by it
Traditional Mix Material of Steel,
Blast-furnace and Ferroalloy Refinings and its Production Method”. Materials of the 7th Congress of Steelmakers. Magnitogorsk, 2002.
Koteniov V.I., Kitaev À.À., Barsukova E.Y “The Initiative project of
the program of industrial waste recycling in the context of ecological doctrine
of the Russian
Federation. Materials of the meeting of mayors of the Central Federal region.
Tula, 2002.
Koteniov V.I., Kitaev À.À., Barsukova E.Y., “The Initiative project of the program of
industrial waste recycling for reduction of natural resources consumption in
the countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States”. Materials
of the business meeting of Byelorussia-Russia-Ukraine. Tula, 2003.
Koteniov V.I., Kitaev À.À., Barsukova E.Y., The technology of cold
briquetting (agglomeration) of industrial waste with the purpose of its usage
in metallurgy industry as raw material. Materials of the
third international congress “Waste Tech-2003”, Moscow, 2003.
Kurunov I.Ph., Savchuk
N.A. Blast furnace production on the boundary of the 21st century.
News of ferrous metallurgy abroad, 2000, supplement 5.
Kurunov I.Ph., Savchuk
N.A. The state and perspectives of without-blast furnace
metallurgy of iron. – Ì: Chermetinformation, 2002.
Kurunov I.Ph. Perspectives
of the usage of non-agglomerated iron-containing materials in blast furnace.
– Ì.
“Metallurgist”, ¹ 5, 2003.
A full or partial reproduction or copying in any form of the published
materials of this publication is permitted only with the prior written
permission of the technology holder - “EcoMashGeo”
Ltd.